Joint Economic Council

 

Memorandum on 2006/2007 budget

 

 

1.         INTRODUCTION

 

The object of this Memorandum is to outline the views of the Private Sector with respect to the present economic context and summarize the proposals of the Joint Economic Council regarding the 2006/2007 Budget.

 

 

2.         PRESENT ECONOMIC CONTEXT

 

The document entitled “Setting the stage for Robust Growth” had already, in August 2005, showed that all major economic indicators were in the red.  The latest data released by the CSO on the National Accounts estimates have shown a further deterioration of those indicators. 

 

The continuous negative growth in the textile and clothing sector, the slowing down of the non-EPZ manufacturing, the upcoming full blast of the sugar price reduction, the macro economic environment characterized by rising unemployment, huge public debt, high budget deficit, falling investment and savings rates and unprecedented high oil price warrant an immediate overhaul of the investment climate. 

 

 

3.         OBJECTIVES OF THE 2006/2007 BUDGET

 

Mauritius should accelerate the emergence of a new economic model where investment is easy, simple and transparent if we want to avoid significant convulsions in the economic as well as social landscape of Mauritius.

 

The “Setting the stage for Robust Growth” document stated in very clear terms that “the only route to more robust growth is more investment. 

 

The growth equation is brutally simple.  “No investment – no growth”.

 

Building on this fundamental premise, the 2006/2007 Budget should focus on “ways and means” for optimizing foreign as well as domestic investment. 

 

The 2006/2007 Budget should aim at putting Mauritius back on the high growth path with a GDP growth target of 6% in 2008.  In  order to reach a GDP growth rate of 6%, investment rate should go up to 30% with private sector share reaching 80% of total investment. 

 

The JEC believes that raising the investment rate to 30% is realistic in the light of the investment potential in the emerging economic model of Mauritius.  As such, private sector investment in the next five years could reach Rs 160 billion in the following clusters:-

 

(i)                  Hospitality & leisure cluster;

(ii)                Seafood & land based oceanic cluster;

(iii)               ICT cluster;

(iv)              Knowledge cluster;

(v)                Sugar cane cluster; and

(vi)              Textile, clothing & fashion cluster.

 

3.1              Hospitality & leisure cluster

 

The hospitality cluster will be driven by leisure hotels, integrated resorts, duty free shopping malls, super speciality health centres and MICE activities.  The hospitality cluster will provide the most significant investment opportunity in terms of construction of 18,000 additional rooms, 2,500 villas and at least 5 major shopping malls.  Total investment in that cluster should be around Rs 120 billion.

 

3.2              Seafood & land based oceanic cluster

 

The seafood cluster which will comprise mainly of activities in aqua culture, fish processing, cold storage, construction of infrastructure facilities such as fishing quays, provision of ancillary services (namely, ship repairs, nets repairs) and land base oceanic activities.  This cluster is expected to trigger at least Rs 10 billion of investment in the next five years.

 

3.3              ICT cluster

 

The ICT development in Mauritius will focus around disaster recovery activities (DRC), business processing outsourcing for the French market, business continuity process, business process outsourcing in the financial services and language-based industries.  This cluster which is more ‘knowledge intensive’ than capital intensive will be driven by openness to “high knowledge worth” human resources.  Investment, in this cluster, is expected to be in the region of Rs 3 billion.

 

3.4              Knowledge cluster

 

With the establishment of an appropriate regulatory framework for the tertiary education, Mauritius will develop a knowledge cluster, which will by driven by a mix of public funded institutions, namely the University of Mauritius and the University of Technology as well as a number of private institutions.  The main areas of training will be in the field of medical/paramedical training, ICT ,engineering, management and finance.  Total private sector investment in this cluster, including infrastructure will be around Rs 2 billion.

 

3.5              Sugar cane cluster

 

The main components of the sugar cane cluster will be the production of raw sugar, refined and special sugars, electricity and ethanol.  Private investment (excluding the social costs) would be around Rs. 15 billion.

 

3.6              Textile, clothing and fashion cluster

 

As the textile and clothing industry will enter the consolidation stage, it will be characterized, on one hand, by vertical integration for some large plants and on the other hand, an “unbundling” of a number of companies which will migrate towards upper segment and niche markets.  The main components of the textile, clothing and fashion cluster will be fabric, upmarket segment for shirts, bottoms, Tshirts as well as back-up services in testing, marketing and design.  Investment in this cluster will be around Rs 10 billion.

 

4.         CONSTRAINTS TO INVESTMENT

 

In Mauritius today, there is a deep concern and shared by all stakeholders, of the dichotomy between the objective of optimizing the investment potential and the heavy bureaucratic business climate which is “choking investment”.  Accordingly, there is an urgent need to embrace “openness” and transform Mauritius into a transparent, efficient and low tax investment platform.  In order to achieve this objective, the JEC suggests that the 2006/2007 Budget focuses on the following issues:-

 

(i)                  the transformation of Mauritius into one seamless and integrated business platform;

(ii)                the adoption of transparent, simple and minimum procedures to start and operate businesses;

(iii)               the establishment of a competitive air access policy;

(iv)              the introduction of competitive pricing policies for international bandwidth;

(v)                the establishment of an open policy to import high skills;

(vi)              the operationalisation of  the Public Private Partnership (PPP) legislation; and

(vii)             the mainstreaming of SMEs in the new economic model;

(viii)           transforming the labour environment into a more flexible one; and

(ix)              establishing the right balance between legislative control and “space” for investment.

 

4.1       Transformation of Mauritius into one integrated business

platform

 

Mauritius needs a more “integrated” economy in its new trajectory.  The main reasons for this integrated approach are:

 

(i)                  to optimize inter-sectoral linkages;

(ii)                to facilitate the clustering approach given that all existing sectors are being re-engineered into dynamic clusters;

(iii)               to accelerate the culture of outsourcing and improve productivity; and

(iv)              to facilitate the emergence of new clusters (seafood, knowledge, ICT, etc)

 

A compartmentalised approach with different corporate tax rates, customs duties and administrative procedures is a major impediment to the emergence of this new economic model.

 

The rationalization of customs duties, the framework of the Companies Act 2001, the new Banking Act, the integration of the “offshore” companies in the tax regime, and almost all sectors paying 15% corporate tax are all reasons in favour of working out a single rate of 15%.  We believe that an integrated business platform will give an opportunity to Government and the business community to revisit all distortions and correct anomalies within the system.

 

In the light of the above, the JEC would like to suggest one business platform with the following parameters:-

 

(i)                  one single corporate tax rate of 15%;

(ii)                one VAT rate of 15%; and

(iii)               low customs duty except for a list of “hypersensitive products” (the list of products identified by the Joint Working Group) which will have a customs duty rate of around 25% - 30%.

 

4.2       Adoption of transparent, simple and minimum procedures to start and operate businesses.

 

In the light of the findings of the Investment Climate Assessment survey, Mauritius can overhaul its outdated “licenses and permits” regimes by adopting a business registry for start ups and abolishing a number of permits which have either become obsolete or being used for ‘revenue raising’ purpose.  As a matter of fact, Government should now make effective its policy announced last year regarding “silent agreement”.

 

Extensive work has already been undertaken and we believe that the 2006/2007 Budget would be the ideal opportunity to send a strong signal to the world that, henceforth, Mauritius is an attractive, transparent and efficient platform to invest. 

 

In that respect, we would invite bold decisions regarding:-

 

(i)                  moving away from business licensing to a system of business registration;

(ii)                introduction of business visas;

(iii)               simple and clear guidelines regarding work permits for “high skills” persons;

(iv)              abolition of unnecessary clearances;

(v)                clarity for non-Mauritians to purchase and invest in property development; and

(vi)              simplifying procedures for registration of property developments.

 

4.2.1        Business registration

 

The procedures for start ups should be streamlined and the existing licensing system should be replaced by a simple business registration.  Furthermore, the period for such registration should be reduced to the minimum.

 

4.2.2        Business visas

 

The procedures to obtain a business visa should be similar to those for a tourist visa, that is at the ‘airport’ for a period for three months.  Furthermore, the change of tourist to business visa should become possible within the country.

 

4.2.3        Work permits

 

The criteria for work permits for ‘high skills’ should be clearly spelt out and obtainable within a period not exceeding 10 days.

 

4.2.4        Abolition of unnecessary clearances

 

At present, a number of permits and clearances (namely, development permits and clearances for fire services, police and health), though relevant only once (normally at the time of construction) have to be provided for, whenever a company moves in ‘approved’ premises.  Requests for such permits for activities which do not necessitate major physical changes (e.g services) should therefore be cancelled.

 

4.2.5        Clarity for non-Mauritians to purchase and invest in property development

 

All non-residents should be able to invest and purchase, in any BOI approved investment automatically. The Non-citizen Property Restriction Act should be amended accordingly.

 

4.2.6        Registration duties for property developments

 

The ranking of Mauritius with respect to the cost and time taken for registering a deed of transfer on immovable property in the “Doing Business Report 2006” is very poor.

 

Accordingly, the procedures for registration of deed of transfer on immovable property should be streamlined.  Furthermore, we would suggest that on the sale for future completion, duty be levied on the property effectively sold and not on the construction not yet effected. 

 

4.3       Putting into place a competitive Air Access Policy

 

The new economic model of Mauritius will be driven by the services sector and a ‘value for money’ up market tourism.  With the declared policy of reaching 2 million tourists, investment in 18,000 additional rooms will become viable only if Mauritius adopts a clear competitive air access policy.

 

The main findings of the NACO Report, unequivocally show that the present air access policy is uncompetitive and is designed to restrict and manage competition.  An analysis of the Bilateral Air Services Agreements has also concluded that the general framework is restrictive and the present air access policy is not sustainable.

 

It is therefore urgent to implement the main recommendations of the NACO Report which has suggested that Mauritius adopts the following policies:-

 

(i)                  Multiple designation with a view to increase capacity and frequencies;

(ii)                Competitive fares; and

(iii)               Code share with more competition.

 

In this context, it is also crucial that Government establishes a strong technical unit to take in charge the negotiations of bilateral air services agreements.

 

4.4       Reducing the price of international bandwidth

 

In spite of the policy decision to open the telecommunications sector in November 2002, IPLC rates continue to be uncompetitive because of the unfair market conditions regarding SAFE.

 

Furthermore, if Mauritius wants to position itself as a destination to attract companies to provide for 24 x 7 real time services, we need to ensure continuous telecoms availability, and as such , a downtime of 0.1% is not acceptable.  Accordingly, one submarine fibre optic (SAFE) with satellite communication as the only back-up to the outside world is a major deterrent.

 

The ICT industry, to-day, is driven by supply and competition.  As such, the whole ICT environment has changed, in a dramatic manner, when compared to the one prevailing in the mid 1990’s when Mauritius took the decision to connect to SAFE.

 

Given the above context, Mauritius needs a connectivity to a second submarine fibre optic cable, namely EASSY.

 

In order for the connectivity to EASSY to be meaningful, Mauritius must strive to meet the following objectives:-

 

(i)                  offer a fibre optic cable back-up separate from SAFE to companies; and

 

(ii)                facilitate an “ownership structure” of EASSY which will bring in some real competition in the telecommunications sector.

 

In the light of the above, the JEC believes that Government should invite a “Request For Proposal” for a joint Government/Private Sector consortium including international investors, to own and manage EASSY.  This will be a critical and fruitful long term investment, in line with ICT long term objectives of Mauritius.

 

4.5       Applying an open policy for skills acquisition

 

The emerging economic model of Mauritius will be knowledge intensive and, as such, optimizing tertiary education opportunities will be a key objective.  The present level of expenditure on tertiary education is around 0.4% of GDP and far below the required level of 1.5%, as in Singapore.  Given the budgetary constraints, it is clear that in order to reach the Singapore benchmark, Mauritius needs to create space for private tertiary institutions, including private universities, to operate.   This route, however, will take time.

 

In view of the above, high skills will have to be imported for the immediate needs.  In that respect we suggest that clear parameters for “skilled labour”, in terms of years of training and experience as well as the level of income, be set. On the basis of these transparent parameters, work permits, including residence permits could be approved within a maximum period of 10 days.

 

4.6       Operationalising the Public Private Partnership (PPP) legislation

 

The JEC would like to reiterate the urgency to operationalise the PPP legislation.  The PPP instrument is the ideal tool to maintain capital expenditure without putting pressure on public debt and the budget deficit.  However, we believe that the present PPP Act should be amended to consider also “unsolicited proposals”.

 

4.7       Mainstreaming SMEs in the new economic model

 

As the manufacturing sector undergoes its difficult transition and large companies move to smaller and lighter “architecture”, there  will be a growing need for specific support services which, indeed, will become essential for sustaining the supply chain.  Such services comprise fashion design, merchandising, marketing and training.  Similarly, growth in the ICT sector will depend on the provision of expert services in areas such as software development, translation, multimedia design and customer-relations management (CRM).  What is common to both types of activities is that they are usually provided by small-size service companies run by experienced  or “knowledge intensive” individuals.

 

The implementation of the measures mentioned at 4.1 to 4.7will have a major impact on emergence of a more vibrant SME sector.  Notwithstanding the indirect effect, the direct results on the smaller companies will be as follows:-

 

(i)                 Integrated platform

 

Linkages between SMEs and larger companies will be easier and less cumbersome.  These linkages will encourage a culture of outsourcing and therefore facilitate the emergence of ‘clustering’.

 

(ii)               New ‘license and permits’ environment

 

It will be easier for SMEs to start their businesses without any heavy bureaucratic delays.

 

(iii)             Competitive air access

 

Smaller hotels and non hotel accommodation will improve their occupancy rates in a significant manner.

 

(iv)             Competitive international bandwidth

 

SMEs will be able to cut their telecommunications cost in a significant manner.

 

(v)               Openness to skills

 

It will be easier for SMEs to have access to higher skills without going through the labyrinth and unending procedures for obtaining work permits.  It will enable SMEs to become more knowledge intensive.

 

4.8       Transforming the labour environment into a more flexible one

 

The existing Industrial Relations Framework should move away from an approach which is based on conflict resolution to one which will be of “participative negotiations”.

 

We need to develop reward and work systems that reconcile both business objectives and employees’ interests.  Such systems should build-up motivation, develop commitment, inculcate a sense of belonging and encourage productivity.  This can only happen in a system of industrial relations with Collective Bargaining based on principles of cooperation and consensus generation.

 

The business community believes that Mauritius must put into place an Industrial Relations Framework that will require moving away from Government intervention to enterprise bargaining.  Collective Bargaining at enterprise level should therefore be the primary source of regulations in the employment relationship.  Collective agreements should replace Remuneration Orders and a bipartite private agreement negotiated between two parties should not suffer from State interference and be given full legal force.

 

4.9       Establishing the right balance between legislative control and “space” for investment

 

Whilst recognizing the need for a strong regulatory environment, the JEC would like to caution against the danger of over regulations and the risk of constraining investment.  The right balance between the appropriate legal framework, self regulation and investment space is an objective that all stakeholders should aim for.

 

We would, therefore, invite Government for very close consultations with the business community prior to the enactment of new legislations and measures which could have an adverse effect on investment.

5.         CONCLUSION

 

Opening up for higher growth

 

The twin challenges facing the economy in terms of low GDP growth and public finance pressure need to be addressed urgently.  However, we believe that by focusing on investment this year, the economic buoyancy that would be triggered would impact positively on employment creation and reduce the pressure on the public finance.

 

The investment potential is fairly significant and Mauritius should endeavour to maximize this potential over the next two years to reach a GDP growth of 6% in 2008.

 

The opening up of the economy will put Mauritius again on the high growth path and ‘compensate’ for the loss of preferences and the limited supply of high skills.  Furthermore, openness will enhance the connectivity of Mauritius and facilitate its integration in the globalization process. 

 

 

 

 

 

JEC

May 2006