| Please wait ... Page loading ... |
|
|
Fighting corruption: a worldwide endeavour
Over the recent years, a series of anti-corruption initiatives have been undertaken by the OECD, World Bank and the IMF as well as by the European Union and the United States. These include the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption (1996), the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (1997) and the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption adopted by the Council of Europe in 1998. The European Union has also passed in 1997 a Convention that criminalises transnational bribery. As regards the EU-ACP Cotonou Agreement, there are several clauses directly related to issues of corruption therein.
All these conventions have clearly pointed out the role that the private sector can play in the fight against corruption. As a first step, the JEC propounds the adoption of a code of conduct.
The purpose of a code of conduct
If a code is a comprehensive collection of laws, instructions or precepts in a given subject area, a code of conduct is a comprehensive statement of the guiding principles of conduct by which a company expects its directors and employees to behave when carrying out their work. Such a code states the values for which the company stands and by which it professes to do its business. It states publicly to customers, shareholders, competitors and all who come into contact with the company what standards of dealing they can expect from its people.
Its value
If a company director or employee is to be held to account for his conduct, it is elementary fairness that he should have been told what was expected of him and that he should know in what way his conduct has fallen short of those expectations. A clear, concise and accessible written statement of the standards by which he is expected to behave in his working environment is a basic requirement.
Its content
A code of conduct usually contains general statements of principle loosely grouped into areas covering diligence, efficiency and thrift; confidentiality and the handling of secret information; personal responsibility and independent judgment; fair dealing and integrity, and professional training. The code can also be broadly divided into provisions dealing with personal integrity and those dealing with managerial responsibilities for upholding the integrity of the company, such as:
A company code of conduct should reflect and reinforce the basic standards set in the criminal legislation dealing with dishonesty and corruption, legislation which in turn provides the foundation of the code. In consequence breach of certain provisions of the code will amount to a criminal offence. Other provisions reflect terms of employment, breach of which constitute disciplinary offences under the company's code of discipline. It is equally a function of a code of conduct to guide employees away from situations in which their integrity can be compromised or the good standing of the company damaged.
Pre-eminently a code performs the essential function of indicating to employees the standards of conduct that should imbue every aspect of their work. Its provisions should state the guiding principles and, at the same time, provide advice sufficiently specific to be of use in any given situation.
A code should, of course, require compliance with the law. The duty to act lawfully means that the employee must not do anything prohibited by the law, particularly the criminal law on corruption. Furthermore if he is in charge of others he should organise and supervise their work in such a way that they are not exposed to unnecessary risk of breaking those laws.
Typically a code will state the company credo that honesty, integrity and fair dealing are its important assets in business. Consequently, all directors and employees must ensure that the company's reputation is not damaged by dishonesty, disloyalty or corruption.
The code will usually go on to deal with:
It will deal finally with compliance with the code and the consequences of failing to comply.
Cultural differences will make for different approaches. The acceptance of gifts is a difficult area. Everyone would agree that gifts and any other benefits that could, or could appear to, influence the director or employee in his duties should not be accepted. How to distinguish such benefits from those that are innocuous is the problem. Essentially two approaches are to be found in codes of conduct.
The first imposes a blanket prohibition on the acceptance of all benefits except those for which permission is given. Certain types of benefit are given general permission, other types require specific permission on a case by case basis.
The other approach seeks to distinguish in the code itself which benefits may be accepted and which may not. The former approach makes the employee's position very clear - he can accept nothing for which he does not have permission. The latter approach places the responsibility on the employee to decide in any given situation whether the benefit falls on one side of the dividing line or the other. But whatever the test, the employee needs to know what his company's stance is on this question of gifts and what is expected of him.
Its preparation
While it is important that the company's statement of what it stands for and what it expects of its people should emanate from the top, it is equally important that employees should contribute to drafting the content and setting its tone. The code must address the ethical issues people have to face every day.
Those who work in purchasing or contracting know all about everyone in the supplier community wanting to be a friend and wanting to do favours. Those in marketing are bound to have to discover what the competition is doing, to gather competitors' intelligence, things they do not want to disclose. The dilemma is how to do that honourably. A code must be pragmatic and practical, it must work, it must be good for profits. Above all, it must be accepted by those who are to lead their working lives in accordance with its guidance. They are more likely to live by it if they have had a hand in its preparation.
Its promulgation and observance
It is perhaps unnecessary to make the point that simply sticking a copy of the new code on the staff canteen wall is unlikely to have much effect on the ethos of the company. Not only must every member of staff receive his or her own copy, everyone must be given practical instruction about its provisions and how to comply with them. Everyone must understand the importance of compliance and the consequences of not complying. But above all, it is the responsibility of management to ensure that the practices of the company are consistent with the code, that there is no contradiction between the standards required of staff and the goals or targets they are expected to meet. It is no good insisting on high quality control standards and at the same time fixing delivery times that can be met only if corners are cut. It must also be the responsibility of every manager and supervisor to make sure that those for whom they are responsible are constantly aware of the standards set by the code and in practice carry out their work in conformity with them.
Its enforcement
When a company has stated in a code what it stands for and how it wants its people to behave and when management and staff apply the code's guidance in their daily work, what must follow is enforcement of the rules. Deliberate failure to comply with the standards required must be met by appropriate disciplinary action. A code honoured more in the breach than the observance could hardly be expected to have any positive effect on the way the company does business. However it is important that, in deciding the appropriate sanction, management should consider whether the breach results from ignorance or from deliberate, self-serving wrongdoing knowing that the company would disapprove or, as is often the case in the headline scandals that sometimes engulf companies, from wrongdoing done for the company's profit in the belief that the conduct would be condoned by management. The company that breeds this third type of employee needs to look at itself. This is the company that is a suitable case for treatment.
Its periodic review
A code of conduct needs to be kept up to date. It should be reviewed at regular intervals to ensure that it reflects changes in the law and gives appropriate emphasis to current issues of concern.
A model, not a prescription
The JEC comprises distinct sectors of the business community. The ethical issues faced daily by the different sectors vary according to the sector. While the core values expressed in a code for the business community are shared values, the guidance required by employees in the financial services industry will emphasise certain conduct which may have little relevance to those in the construction industry. Furthermore, the law applying to one sector may not apply to another. And, since the tone and style of codes of conduct will depend on the management style of the company itself, it is not possible to prescribe a code that would fit the needs of all sectors without making it unwieldy and partly irrelevant.
For these reasons this code is a model to be adapted and modified, in the first place by each of the sectors of the business community and in the second by the individual companies of these sectors. At each stage however the core values expressed in this model should be faithfully reflected.
The Model Code
Introduction by the chairman/managing director
PERSONAL CONDUCT
RELATIONS WITH SUPPLIERS AND CONTRACTORS
RESPONSIBILITIES TO SHAREHOLDERS AND THE FINANCIAL COMMUNITY
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES
RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE COMMUNITY
COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT
Other standards
PERSONAL CONDUCT
RELATIONS WITH CUSTOMERS AND CONSUMERS
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES - INFORMATION FLOW